tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5901419113943826002.post2482219928565443412..comments2023-10-20T09:28:41.407-04:00Comments on Old Word Wolf: Significant Omissions.http://www.blogger.com/profile/00844820226732949474noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5901419113943826002.post-3572787729487034732011-10-26T19:09:36.845-04:002011-10-26T19:09:36.845-04:00@Anonymous: Round of applause for the one who thin...@Anonymous: Round of applause for the one who thinks it's solid to omit the very points of accuracy that would help readers to a substantially fuller understanding of the facts. It's "Dunn-Rankin," right? Glad t'meetcha.Danhttp://www.poynter.orgnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5901419113943826002.post-38464070817627773602011-10-26T16:13:59.709-04:002011-10-26T16:13:59.709-04:00I thought it was a solid news story!I thought it was a solid news story!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5901419113943826002.post-42112002329171026942011-10-22T13:06:34.071-04:002011-10-22T13:06:34.071-04:00Don't overlook that the Sun's story is a l...Don't overlook that the Sun's story is a light rewrite, introduce its own errors, of state-digested press release. The reporter didn't, as you rightly imply, verify that spin doc by simply comparing it with the federal report.Gradyhttp://www.factcheck.orgnoreply@blogger.com